home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ ftp.cs.arizona.edu / ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar / ftp.cs.arizona.edu / icon / newsgrp / group99a.txt / 000221_icon-group-sender _Tue Oct 26 14:52:47 1999.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  2000-09-20  |  1KB
  1. Return-Path: <icon-group-sender>
  2. Received: (from root@localhost)
  3.     by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id OAA11594
  4.     for icon-group-addresses; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 14:50:33 -0700 (MST)
  5. Message-Id: <199910262150.OAA11594@baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU>
  6. X-Authentication-Warning: agate-ether.berkeley.edu: news set sender to <news> using -f
  7. From: anyone@No-Such-Domain.anywhere (see.signature)
  8. X-Newsgroups: comp.lang.icon
  9. Subject: differences in Icon versions
  10. X-Newsreader: slrn (0.9.4.3 UNIX)
  11. Date: 26 Oct 1999 17:28:19 +0100
  12. X-Trace: 26 Oct 1999 17:28:19 +0100, flex111.dnwl.wau.nl
  13. To: icon-group@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
  14. Errors-To: icon-group-errors@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
  15. Status: RO
  16.  
  17.  
  18. Hi,
  19.  
  20. my question relates to differences in the basic versions of ICON. I do
  21. have the book "The Icon Progr. Language" (1983). It is quite old, but i
  22. am wondering if the stuff relating to generators, string scanning,
  23. co-expressions and list processing changed substantially.
  24.  
  25. thanks,
  26.  
  27. Marc
  28.  
  29. -- 
  30. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  31. email: marc dot hoffmann at users dot whh dot wau dot nl
  32. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  33.